Denise (![[staff profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user_staff.png)
denise) wrote in ![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
dw_advocacy2024-09-17 07:25 am
denise) wrote in dw_advocacy2024-09-17 07:25 am
Entry tags:
The current list of cases!
Here's a list of all the cases we've contributed to challenging terrible and unconstitutional internet law (so far)!
Last updated: 22 February 2026
* Netchoice, LLC v Bonta (5:22-cv-08861) N.D. California
* and its appeal, NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta (23-2969), 9th Circuit (affirmed and remanded)
* Netchoice, LLC v Yost (2:24-cv-00047) S.D. Ohio
* Netchoice, LLC v. Fitch (1:24-cv-00170) S.D. Mississippi
* and its appeal, NetChoice v. Fitch (24-60341), 5th Circuit
* NetChoice LLC v. Reyes (2:23-cv-00911) D. Utah
* NetChoice v. Skrmetti (3:24-cv-01191) M.D. Tennessee
* NetChoice v. Carr 1:25-cv-02422, (N.D. Ga.)
* NetChoice v. Jason S. Miyares 1:25-cv-02067, (E.D. Va.)
* Netchoice v. Wilson 3:26-cv-00543, (D.S.C.)
And chalk up an extra point for the one we helped to win even though we couldn't provide a declaration (because the law was written so that it didn't apply to us): NetChoice v. Murrill, 3:25-cv-00231, (M.D. La.), law permanently enjoined as unconstitutional, in which our example of blocking Mississippi after the Fifth Circuit overturned the preliminary injunction in Netchoice v Fitch helped to show the judge that these laws have a chilling effect on speech not just on the companies who own the websites they apply to (that's us), but also on the users of those sites (that's you).
Would you like the possible chance to yell at the court alongside us in a future lawsuit? Register your interest here!
Last updated: 22 February 2026
* Netchoice, LLC v Bonta (5:22-cv-08861) N.D. California
* and its appeal, NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta (23-2969), 9th Circuit (affirmed and remanded)
* Netchoice, LLC v Yost (2:24-cv-00047) S.D. Ohio
* Netchoice, LLC v. Fitch (1:24-cv-00170) S.D. Mississippi
* and its appeal, NetChoice v. Fitch (24-60341), 5th Circuit
* NetChoice LLC v. Reyes (2:23-cv-00911) D. Utah
* NetChoice v. Skrmetti (3:24-cv-01191) M.D. Tennessee
* NetChoice v. Carr 1:25-cv-02422, (N.D. Ga.)
* NetChoice v. Jason S. Miyares 1:25-cv-02067, (E.D. Va.)
* Netchoice v. Wilson 3:26-cv-00543, (D.S.C.)
And chalk up an extra point for the one we helped to win even though we couldn't provide a declaration (because the law was written so that it didn't apply to us): NetChoice v. Murrill, 3:25-cv-00231, (M.D. La.), law permanently enjoined as unconstitutional, in which our example of blocking Mississippi after the Fifth Circuit overturned the preliminary injunction in Netchoice v Fitch helped to show the judge that these laws have a chilling effect on speech not just on the companies who own the websites they apply to (that's us), but also on the users of those sites (that's you).
Would you like the possible chance to yell at the court alongside us in a future lawsuit? Register your interest here!
no subject
no subject
Not really -- it's hard to make templates for state legislation because it's all different (although, stay tuned, we are working on something, heh). Bad Internet Bills has good explanations of the problems with various laws that you can crib from, though.