Denise (
denise) wrote in
dw_advocacy2026-03-03 08:17 am
Victory in Virginia!!
On Friday, the judge hearing our VA case issued a preliminary injunction preventing the state from enforcing Virginia's SB 854 against any Netchoice member (which means us!) while the lawsuit proceeds. Judge Giles's ruling is a little technical in places and covers a number of legal issues that I keep meaning to get around to explaining someday so folks can have a better grasp on the kind of things they'll see argued in cases like these, like strict scrutiny and associational standing, but the end result is still pretty clear, I think: the judge agrees Netchoice has made a strong enough showing right from the start that the law is unconstitutional to block the state from doing anything to enforce it until the full case can be heard.
This is only the beginning of that particular fight and we still have a ways to go, but it's great news for us, for all our users from Virginia, and for the internet as a whole. Three cheers for the Netchoice team and the outside litigation counsel, who are Clement & Murphy for this one! The full docket in RECAP: NetChoice v. Jason S. Miyares, 1:25-cv-02067, (E.D. Va.).
This is only the beginning of that particular fight and we still have a ways to go, but it's great news for us, for all our users from Virginia, and for the internet as a whole. Three cheers for the Netchoice team and the outside litigation counsel, who are Clement & Murphy for this one! The full docket in RECAP: NetChoice v. Jason S. Miyares, 1:25-cv-02067, (E.D. Va.).

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
--Paul from NetChoice
no subject
no subject
Welcome, wonderful to have you here!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Hi Paul! Welcome to Dreamwidth! I in particular appreciate y'all's efforts since I'm in Mississippi!
Y'all're the best!
no subject
no subject
Congratulations on this!
no subject
And hooray to the counsel team continuing to make sure that the appropriate scrutiny standards are applied to cases that are very clearly about restricting speech.
no subject